Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsem
Yes, I think the higher density will make a difference, but I don't think it needs to be >300dpi like iPad/iPhone. And given the tradeoff in terms of CPU/GPU power consumption I'd prefer it to be only as much as it needs to be so my eyes don't register any lack of smoothness at normal viewing distance, and no more than that.
|
We have similar priorities. The iPad and macbook pro for that matter actually use different densities. Apple's calculations do account for different viewing distances between device categories, but the iPad 3 (260ish ppi?) still runs significantly hotter and weighs more, both due to the significant battery increase necessary to support the resolution. Sadly, some like Samsung followed suit chasing a marketing gimmick instead of nailing down a good balance.
I approve of Asus' approach more. Early reviews of the prime infinity -- which carries a pixel density comparable to the n7 -- are positive. And indeed, density itself isn't the only issue and higher quality displays like IPS, AMOLED etc, bringing better viewing angles, brightness levels or higher contrast have a role to play as well.