View Single Post
Old 06-26-2012, 11:37 AM   #33
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,729
Karma: 205159604
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
My unease lies in the idea of prohibiting future agency pricing, given that per se it's an entirely legal practice.
I'd agree, if agency pricing were being proscribed forever. But they're only being asked to abandon their illegally (allegedly) gained leverage for a period of two (or three?) years. Which seems to me like a perfectly valid compromise between outright denying their right to use agency pricing and allowing an end-run around collusion laws that only requires offenders to pay a monetary penalty for leverage gained illegally. I think most of the publishers would have agreed to just pay the fine up front and proceed to "collude away" if that were the case.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 06-26-2012 at 11:43 AM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote