View Single Post
Old 06-26-2012, 02:24 AM   #82
HappyMartin
Martin Kristiansen
HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HappyMartin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HappyMartin's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,546
Karma: 8480958
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Johannesburg
Device: Kindle International Ipad 2
Dont like the term photoshop when referring to retouching an image. A lot of work done on images is not done in photoshop. In the industry photoshop is more likely used for manipulated rather than retouched but even that is sloppy inaccurate shorthand.

In photography "capture" has just about replaced "take" as a term referring to the actual moment of image creation with a camera. DSLR has replaced SLR and MFDB has replaced MF.

The funny thing is film was, in a sense, more digital than an electronic sensor. The reason is a silver halide particle was always either exposed and developed or not. It never had any shaded of grey. It was black or it was simply not there after being removed in processing while every sensor site or pixel can display 256 discrete values in 8 bit.
HappyMartin is offline   Reply With Quote