MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

Steven630 · 06-22-2012, 10:23 AM

This is a tiny little problem I noticed a long time ago while reading The Economist. Normally, Each article in the TOC of economist.com has two topic lines, like:

Robot ethics
Morals and the machine

So in Calibre, we get Robot ethics: Morals and the machine

But sometimes, the there's no red line, especially in technology quarterly section or if it's a correction article, like:

Correction: International banking

In this case, Calibre would put the red topic line of the previous article to it.

For example:

Free exchange
Silicon sally

Correction: International banking

Therefore becomes, Free exchange: Silicon sally (which is right) and Free exchange: Correction: International banking (which is confusing at first sight).

In the technology quarterly section of Jun 2nd quite many articles were affected by this:http://www.economist.com/printedition/2012-06-02
(this first article in technology quarterly has a red line Monitor , so all the following articles ended up beginning with Monitor.

I think there should be a quick fix to it. Can anyone help?

06-22-2012, 10:23 AM	#1
Steven630 Groupie Posts: 178 Karma: 10 Join Date: May 2012 Device: Kindle Paperwhite2	Redundant topic line This is a tiny little problem I noticed a long time ago while reading The Economist. Normally, Each article in the TOC of economist.com has two topic lines, like: Robot ethics Morals and the machine So in Calibre, we get Robot ethics: Morals and the machine But sometimes, the there's no red line, especially in technology quarterly section or if it's a correction article, like: Correction: International banking In this case, Calibre would put the red topic line of the previous article to it. For example: Free exchange Silicon sally Correction: International banking Therefore becomes, Free exchange: Silicon sally (which is right) and Free exchange: Correction: International banking (which is confusing at first sight). In the technology quarterly section of Jun 2nd quite many articles were affected by this:http://www.economist.com/printedition/2012-06-02 (this first article in technology quarterly has a red line Monitor , so all the following articles ended up beginning with Monitor. I think there should be a quick fix to it. Can anyone help? Last edited by Steven630; 06-22-2012 at 10:27 AM.