Thread: Green is Good!
View Single Post
Old 06-22-2012, 02:36 AM   #3
VaporPunk
Evangelist
VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
VaporPunk's Avatar
 
Posts: 409
Karma: 49204386
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Device: Kindle 4 + Asus Transformer
Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin View Post
It's a lot more complicated than how much power a tablet uses while you're on it. There's a lot more energy involved in making one than in making a book. And green means a lot more than just power consumed. Computer circuit boards are known to involve a lot of very message manufacturing processes, and there's the disposal of the worn out ones afterwards. Paper books can be put in a landfill; computer stuff cannot (especially the lithium based batteries).

I've never seen a clear-cut comparsion that I found plausible on the complete life cycle of paper books vs ebook readers. When you factor in the stuff people do on tables vs desktops, or televisions, I doubt such a comparison is even possible.

Interesting point, though.
You're correct, of course, its never that simple and the comparison I made is unfair. I think quite a few electronic components can be recycled these days, though, so I'm guessing the edge goes to the e-reader vs paper books but can't really back that up without doing some research.
VaporPunk is offline   Reply With Quote