View Single Post
Old 06-15-2012, 09:23 AM   #22
GreenMonkey
DRM hater
GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GreenMonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
GreenMonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 945
Karma: 2066176
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Device: Nook ST glow, Kindle Voyage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekaros View Post
This is already done on PC games and digital market.

In digital world I see this as acceptable practice, I can't resell my games, but on other hand I can wait for them and almost every time get them from sales, so I pay 10-50% of the price. Also good services like Steam make life much easier if you have good internet connection.

Still, it's purely wrong if this is done for physical products. Not sure if they can enforce it though...
I personally think it's wrong for digital sales also. Music on a CD is a digital source also. Video on a DVD is a digital source. I don't see it as any different. I pretty much refuse to buy DRM'd, non-transferrable content over $10 (and for ebooks more like $3). Yes, even Steam.

I feel that it violates my right to do as a I wish with my property. And I want it to work in 20 years if I want. I don't consider DRM'd purchases actual ownership. DRM devalues games to less than 10% of its normal value, to me. Ditto for books. I'd rather actually own property than "license" it.

Last edited by GreenMonkey; 06-15-2012 at 09:30 AM.
GreenMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote