View Single Post
Old 06-15-2012, 02:14 AM   #56
Kumabjorn
Basculocolpic
Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Kumabjorn's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,356
Karma: 20181319
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Kindle 4SO, Kindle for Android, Sony PRS-350 and PRS-T1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluribus View Post
One of the differences between English and many other languages is that there isn't any regulatory group guiding the language. No L'Académie française, Rat für deutsche Rechtschreibung, Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española.

The evolution of English should, as a result, be more open and fluid. It allows English to borrow liberally from any language. No group can say, "No, no, no! That isn't English." In other words, English is a thoroughly crowd-source language.

Some of the oddities of English spelling were introduced by folks (I tend to think that they were fools) who tried to guide the language and popularized the idea that spelling should indicate the original source of the word. "Qu" tends to show French, for example. There are others that show Latin, Greek, and such. One problem being that these folks where sometimes wrong in their etymology.
You can't regulate a language anymore than you can regulate sex. Those entities you mentioned present recommendations, not rules.
Kumabjorn is offline   Reply With Quote