View Single Post
Old 06-14-2012, 01:40 PM   #284
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
Under the terms of the settlements, the publishers have to offer new contracts to all retailers (including Amazon). Since they are barred from offering Apple an MFN clause, they can similarly refuse to offer one to Amazon-and they'll be backed by the DOJ, who must approve these contracts. So Amazon's MFN clause is probably going away, for the settling publishers.
Does the court have the power to void the current contracts with Amazon/B&N and other retailers, if the retailers wish to keep them? Given that Amazon et al are not a party to these proceedings?
If not, then those MFN clauses would remain until the current contracts end.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote