View Single Post
Old 06-13-2012, 09:08 PM   #34
rkomar
Wizard
rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,058
Karma: 18821071
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury, ON, Canada
Device: PRS-505, PB 902, PRS-T1, PB 623, PB 840, PB 633
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScalyFreak View Post
I could answer that if I knew what hardware you have

The game has the potential to look as good, but it's not the best optimized game I ever played. With a PC that can max everything out, it's a pretty game.
Ha! I have an old copy of Win2k and a slightly newer work-related copy of WinXP, both running under VirtualBox emulation in Linux. I suspect the game would not look very good for me.

I was curious whether the intro scenes were rendered using something other than the actual game. I haven't bought a new game since Max Payne 2 (~2004), so I'm well behind the times in knowing what modern PC games look like. I guess I'm not one of those losing reading time to that class of leisurely pursuits.
rkomar is offline   Reply With Quote