View Single Post
Old 06-13-2012, 02:51 PM   #39
stonetools
Wizard
stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
stonetools's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,016
Karma: 2838487
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Ipad, IPhone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward M. Grant View Post
And how many important books of those genres are sitting in a trunk because no publisher would buy them?

About a dozen publishers turned down the billion-dollar Harry Potter franchise, for example. If Rowling had given up before trying number thirteen, we would never have heard of it.
Actually, what you should be celebrating is not that a dozen publishers saw no merit in an offering by an untried "welfare mother" (that's how conservatives would describe her) but that a publisher did have the balls to put their money down on what was a giant gamble. Just goes to show that if you keep trying , and if you have something good, some publisher will likely invest in you, and share the financial risk of developing your book from a manuscript and bringing it to market.
Notice that's "likely", not "certainly." Contrary to popular belief round these parts, there are good and valid business reasonms for a publisher to turn down an aspiring author, and forego what is a risky business proposition. (Most books don't turn a profit for the publisher).

Last edited by stonetools; 06-13-2012 at 03:01 PM.
stonetools is offline   Reply With Quote