View Single Post
Old 06-13-2012, 12:05 PM   #263
AnemicOak
Bookaholic
AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
AnemicOak's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,391
Karma: 54969924
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota
Device: iPad Mini 4, AuraHD, iPhone XR +
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I'm probably wrong, too, but ISTR that the settlement has some sort of "collective profit" element in it, rather than it being a simple "NO book can be sold at a loss" thing. Does anyone know for sure?
The retailer can sell individual titles at a loss, but must show a profit overall for all the books it sells from that publisher’s catalog, or at least that's my understanding.
AnemicOak is offline   Reply With Quote