View Single Post
Old 06-13-2012, 10:01 AM   #17
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,707
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools
My guess is that most of the comments are from book industry insiders, who unlike the typical person, have "skin in the game" . Most of those comments are going to be "anti-settlement" or to be more precise, are going to want the settlement terms to go easier on the publishers.
I agree with you, actually.

My question is what has happened to the comments that came from people who aren't "skin-in-the-game industry biggies?" Surely more than 150 letters have been sent to the address (physical and email) that has been posted here and other places around the internet. If there's no filtering process, a few pro-settlement letters have made it through, right?

I'm not saying there's any funny business going on. I'm just saying that the numbers don't quite jive here.

Is the DoJ accepting and considering/including all comments sent to the official addresses? If so, they have more than 150 (on the date of that particular claim). If they're not... what's the criteria for inclusion? That's all I'm asking.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 06-13-2012 at 10:05 AM.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote