View Single Post
Old 06-13-2012, 05:11 AM   #11
sun surfer
languorous autodidact ✦
sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sun surfer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
sun surfer's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,235
Karma: 44667380
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: smiling with the rising sun
Device: onyx boox poke 2 colour, kindle voyage
Quote:
Originally Posted by xg4bx View Post
if an author signs on the dotted line, how is anyone 'cheated' out of anything? this is literally the first time i've heard of this practice.

his book is also 18mb including pictures. whats the average ebook, 300kb? of course hes going to pay more, maybe he should have read the ToS before he eagerly submitted his book.

it boils down to don't like it, then don't use it. i'm sure hes still walking away with a far better deal than he'd get from any publisher.
I think it's more the disingenuous way it comes across. It seems as if Amazon are somewhat trying to trick authors into thinking they only take one type of cut, and then *SURPRISE* they charge a (ridiculously inflated) delivery charge as well.

I have no idea how clear that is in their terms, but on first glance it would seem that to have the "delivery charge" completely separate from their "cut" when you know that 99% of that "delivery charge" is really also their cut isn't an especially above-board business practice.

Not that this would apply to Amazon, but pertaining to your post, there have been businesses convicted of deceptive business practices that were technically legal except for the deceptive way they were presented.

Last edited by sun surfer; 06-13-2012 at 05:14 AM.
sun surfer is offline   Reply With Quote