View Single Post
Old 06-11-2012, 05:31 PM   #231
AnemicOak
Bookaholic
AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
AnemicOak's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,391
Karma: 54969924
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota
Device: iPad Mini 4, AuraHD, iPhone XR +
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
Harlequin isn't competing for slots on the NYTimes bestseller lists, in which sales-per-week matter. Release-week sales have a big impact on book ratings, and Tor won't want to mess that up.

They won't window on their own site first because they don't want to cannibalize their ratings-making sales. (Nevermind whether that'd actually happen; look at how many publishers aren't willing to risk hardcover sales by supporting good ebooks.)
I tend to agree with that. Just throwing out things they could do if they wanted to get around agency pricing agreements.
AnemicOak is offline   Reply With Quote