Quote:
Originally Posted by wallcraft
One potential reason is that it is closer to the device (Qt -> framebuffer vs GTK+/Qt/?? -> X11 -> framebuffer)
|
This is meaningless. You can't just count the number of layers and predict ANYTHING.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallcraft
and has been designed specifically for small resource limited devices.
|
kdrive - embedded X.org configuration - has been designed specifically for small resource limited devices.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallcraft
Also, the iLiad can run relatively few applications, because the apps it likes were developed 10-15 years ago before computers got fast and APIs got heavy.
|
I have no idea why iLiad can run only those apps. It has nothing to do with X.org.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallcraft
I am following OpenInkpot's progress with interest, and I agree that it opens up the possibility of multiple solutions on top of the same kernel.
|
Please read about the X.org developments and especially kdrive a bit. Every single person complaining about X.org had NFI about kdrive before I pointed to it.
Damn, people associate X.org with behemothic KDE and GNOME nowadays. I hate it.
Please, please.