View Single Post
Old 06-08-2012, 10:16 AM   #81
cjr72
Groupie
cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 172
Karma: 2900000
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: A Yankee in Texas
Device: Nexus 6p, Nexus 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
Mock ( or try to mock me ) all you want, bub. I'd prefer that you and others just address my arguments. On this point, of course, you can't.
IANAL but I'll give it a shot. Your quote above is an example of vertical price fixing which has been found in the US to be a legal form of price fixing. What we are discussing is horizontal price fixing among competing book manufacurers which is not legal in the US.

Quote:
Since 1997, the US Court divided price fixing into two categories: vertical and horizontal maximum price fixing.[5] In State Oil Co. v Khan,[6] the US Supreme Court held that vertical price fixing is no longer considered a per se violation of the Sherman Act, but horizontal price fixing is still considered a breach of the Sherman Act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_f...tes_and_Canada
cjr72 is offline   Reply With Quote