View Single Post
Old 06-08-2012, 05:21 AM   #8
Top100EbooksRank
Banned
Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 304
Karma: 6102528
Join Date: Mar 2012
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlesatan View Post
Operational costs. Amazon can afford not to make a profit selling eBooks (i.e. forgoing its entire 30% share (assuming they actually do this... they've done so in the past but there's no guarantee they'll do so now). Barnes & Noble can't. (They're not losing money but it's hard to sustain a business when you're not gaining any revenue.)

Agree with the rest of your assessment though.

You lose money on some ebooks but you make more money on others. It's a strategy retailers have been doing for decades. In addition, Barnes and Noble can discount less than Amazon.

According to the DOJ, Amazon has been "consistently profitable selling ebooks."
Top100EbooksRank is offline   Reply With Quote