View Single Post
Old 06-06-2012, 11:39 AM   #106
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,648
Karma: 205022288
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
Publishers aren't tech companies. That isn't their job. Its tech companies that "engineer" device platforms (the clue is in the word "engineer?").

The publishers job is to find, develop, and bring to market authors. That's a whole another game from creating ereading devices.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't publishers have to give those tech companies license to use property that they held the distribution rights to in the first place? Property whose creators they (the publishers) found, developed, and marketed?

Whether or not they (the publishers) could have done anything to stem the tide of the ebook's popularity is a discussion that certainly has merit. But the idea that they couldn't have possibly foreseen the ebook's potential just doesn't hold water. They simply chose to believe the ebook had no potential. There's a difference between "lack of foresight" and "couldn't have foreseen."

Last edited by DiapDealer; 06-06-2012 at 11:42 AM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote