View Single Post
Old 06-02-2012, 09:49 AM   #26
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga View Post
Again: if Google was only doing search, it would be a big question about fair use.

Or: If the libraries were making archive copies for internal use, that would be acceptable.

But again: The settlement agreement explicitly grants Google the right to sell the scanned books. That clearly goes beyond anything that could conceivably be considered "fair use."
The New York Law School Review agrees:
Quote:
Google’s permitted uses under the settlement go well beyond the most favorable fair use that could plausibly be imagined
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote