View Single Post
Old 06-02-2012, 03:11 AM   #23
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
If the works truly are orphaned, is it wrong if no one lodges a complaint? Is it restricted if there's no law dealing with it, or implicitly permitted?
Well wrong is a moral judgement rather than a legal one, and as I've said, I tend to agree that it might be a good thing.
There is a law covering the copyright status of orphan works, they are covered by the same law all other works, and are copyrighted.
If the law needs changing to make an exception for orphan works, then it should be changed. But companies cannot be allowed to simply pick and choose which bits of the law they will obey. It is the job of the legislature to define the law, not Google's.

Last edited by murraypaul; 06-02-2012 at 03:29 AM.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote