View Single Post
Old 06-01-2012, 02:00 PM   #2
QuantumIguana
Philosopher
QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
QuantumIguana's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
Eyeballs aren't everything. It's possible that they get more of a return out of print ads than out of ads in other media, despite having less percentage of the eyeballs. I don't know if this is true or not, but it could be true. Businesses do make mistakes, but generally, they aren't going to overpay if they realize they are overpaying.

Perhaps the ads in print are read by people with more disposable income. Perhaps people are more likely to respond to print ads than mobile ads. I'm often baffled by on-line ads, often I see ads that don't match with what someone viewing that web page would actually want. Print ads are generally more tailored to the demographic that would read that magazine.
QuantumIguana is offline   Reply With Quote