View Single Post
Old 06-01-2012, 02:16 AM   #65
VaporPunk
Evangelist
VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
VaporPunk's Avatar
 
Posts: 409
Karma: 49204386
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Device: Kindle 4 + Asus Transformer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Lister View Post
The free market is deciding. You want to force them.
No its not. Its a bunch of suits in a corporate boardroom deciding that they will ban a popular band because of its political position. Its an attempt at censorship, plain and simple. It might be legally within their rights, but its not right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nogle View Post
If Clear Channel chooses not to play Dixie Chicks on a station because they think their audience doesn't like the music, would they be justified?
Motivation matters. I'm not saying a band has a right to be played, I'm saying a corporation that bans a band that doesn't have the "right" politics is practicing a form of censorship. And it should be called out on it.

Going back to the roots of this discussion, it all started with this statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xg4bx View Post
its not 'censorship' if its not done by a government entity.
I disagree. Corporations are also capable of censorship. See above for example.
VaporPunk is offline   Reply With Quote