View Single Post
Old 05-31-2012, 03:26 PM   #334
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 79,986
Karma: 147448039
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwidude View Post
Indeed, that is another way of doing it. In actual fact this dialog has three cases like this:

- Remove existing cover / Insert or Replace cover
- Remove margins from Adobe .xpgt files / Remove Adobe .xpgt files and links
- Remove legacy metadata jackets / Remove all metadata jackets

In all these cases if you choose the latter option, then the former option is redundant and should not be chosen by the user.

I'm up for feedback from people about this. The options are:
(1) Treat those three pairs of options above as checkboxes that when checked will uncheck their "partner".
(2) If the first option is checked, do nothing. If the second option is checked, uncheck and disable the first option. You must uncheck the second option to enable the first option.
(3) Do nothing. Behind the scenes I will ignore the fact that you chose the first option if the second is checked.

Suggestions please
1 and 3 are OK. I don't like 2. But for my vote, I'd go with 1. I prefer the idea of having the correct options checked based on what I've checked.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote