View Single Post
Old 05-31-2012, 12:27 AM   #56
Giggleton
Banned
Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,687
Karma: 4368191
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Device: Kindle3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dulin's Books View Post
the cases previously linked to said as long as the CATV or cable company etc were delivering an unaltered broadcast then they were not breaching the copyright of the broadcaster. so the copyright to the entire stream belongs to the broadcaster.

the catv/cable/satellite company may only act as a conduit to bring the stream to the customers house. this case rests on whether it can be shown that the hopper commercial skipper acts prior to the consumer. if it does than its infringement if it doesnt than dish is in the clear
Sounds like lawyer garbage to me, all television shows make use of the broadcast spectrum, POLLUTION OF THE AIRWAVES, MENTAL AND PHYSICAL. Are you upset that these consumers of your pollution are skipping some of your precious show??
Giggleton is offline   Reply With Quote