Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks
Personally, I recommend using a full path (back) everywhere. If the section gets split, the path gets adjusted. If it is only a current page, relative path (starts with #) it will orphan.
Here is a sample(borrowed from a TOC, but it still applies)
Code:
<p class="indent">Per regulation <a href="../Text/footnotes.html#fn1-01" id="chap1">[*1-01]</a> and others. </p>
Link back to the Anchor point
Code:
<p class="foot"><a class="calibre4" href="../Text/chap1.xhtml#chap1">ONE</a></p>
|
Why would the section get split or the path adjusted? Is that something the Kindle or Nook might do? And this may be a very stupid question, but how do I find out what the path is for each of my links?
There are so many, I don't think I will have time to make those changes. (I am moving soon and am in the middle of sorting and packing up my house. I really wanted to get this book done before I move.) Is it very risky to keep my footnote links the way they are?
ETA: When I made the opening post, I looked for a "code" button but couldn't find it, which is why I used quote tags instead. Is there a "code" button, or is that just something you add manually?