View Single Post
Old 05-28-2012, 08:59 PM   #153
geekmaster
Carpe diem, c'est la vie.
geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
geekmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,433
Karma: 10773670
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Multiverse 6627A
Device: K1 to PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by knc1 View Post
It was a simple "yes/no" question about your tcc not about your tccmake.

I think that the leading: "could probably" translates into "untested".
I can't read anything else in the noise that is relevant to my question past the first ", but ..."

But thank you for your reply.
Your way has complications. My previous post gives the details. If you want to know WHAT the complications are of using your suggested method, go back and read past the ", but" in my previous post. I did not say I did not do it. In fact I did try that (successfully) and then I rejected it as version-dependent. I decided to fix the missing symlink instead of forcing libraries (that may not even be used all the time). I want to keep my scripts small and simple.

Last edited by geekmaster; 05-28-2012 at 09:02 PM.
geekmaster is offline   Reply With Quote