View Single Post
Old 07-05-2008, 06:14 PM   #22
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by NigelS View Post
Previous versions of Adobe Reader have claimed to load faster. In practice this has always been achieved by pre-loading most of it when you start windows......so I'm dubious about this new claim......
It still does, running a file called \Program Files\Adobe Reader 9.0\Reader\Reader_sl.exe from the HK Local Machine Registry Hive.

That said, it loads a lot faster here (about 4 seconds for a first run, down to about 2 seconds once cached) than Adobe 8 did. (My desktop is a Win XP Pro SP3 machine with 1GB of RAM and multiple 7200 RPM drives.)

I haven't tested it without the pre-load. I can afford the required resources to use that.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote