Quote:
Originally Posted by jgaiser
There you go again. The *issue* isn't reading devices. The *issue* isn't Agency Pricing. The *issue* is collusion. Which you continue to ignore and make it some other issue. Did the defendants *collude* to raise prices. If the Feds layout a good enough case, and the jury agrees, they're guilty. Simply, huh? Forget Agency Pricing. Forget ebook readers. That isn't the point.
|
I'm answering the issue about whether an impartial jury can be chosen, and whether such a jury is capable of understanding the issues. I say yes.
Do you disagree?