View Single Post
Old 05-25-2012, 05:29 PM   #8
Shaggy
Wizard
Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Shaggy's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dulin's Books View Post
yes. the entire broadcast is protected by copyright. they have for many years made this very noticeable announcements prior to sports programs and others
The copyright holder claiming that doing something they don't like is copyright infringement, doesn't mean that it actually is copyright infringement.

Quote:
while in the most cases it may be precedent that cable and satellite providers arent infringing re-broadcasts altering the broadcast will not pass the legal test.
Assuming that skipping parts of the content during playback counts as "altering the broadcast" and/or "rebroadcasting", which I'm a bit skeptical of.
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote