View Single Post
Old 05-25-2012, 04:14 PM   #39
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,699
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
No collusion is the defense at the pretrial stage. If they lose at trial, they'll fire up defense #2 at the appeals stage.
So wouldn't the fact that they have that second line of defense all ready to go imply that they know the first-line of defense isn't going to hold up?

I really don't understand how someone can simultaneously hold both "no, we did not collude" and "OK we colluded but felt we had no choice" positions. Besides... the second isn't really a defense, it's a mitigating factor for reduced charges or a lesser sentence.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 05-25-2012 at 05:37 PM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote