Thread: Apple says DoJ "sides with monopoly, rather than competition"
View Single Post
Old 05-25-2012, 01:04 PM   #31
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
So you reject Apple's interpretations of what happened. Remember, though, Apple doesn't have the burden of proof. For example, if there is a good business reason why the agreements between Apple and the publishers are similar in wording,then the court will likely find for Apple. 50-50 means Apple wins.
Apple kept each publisher informed of the conversations with the others. How did they interpret this if not by collusion?
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote