Thread: Apple says DoJ "sides with monopoly, rather than competition"
View Single Post
Old 05-25-2012, 12:15 PM   #26
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
LINK

Based on that case, the Supreme Court is at least open to a "second line of defense" argument, contrary to popular belief.
The issue is not, and never has been, whether any particular price-setting arrangement is legal. The issue is that colluding to introduce a price-setting arrangement, even a legal one, is illegal.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote