View Single Post
Old 05-24-2012, 09:46 PM   #3
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by teh603 View Post
What's the definition of a "professional" author?
That's a good question - I'd be inclined to suggest: What do you put on your tax return? (Or to cover all bases: What would you put on your tax return if you submitted one? ) If you state your occupation a (at least partly) as author and state income and expenses relating to this occupation then I think you can probably claim it as a profession.

What I found most interesting about the survey was that publishers scored highest for those things you can actually buy for yourself - editing and cover-design etc. (though obtaining the same levels of experience etc. is, of course, less certain). It is disappointing, though perhaps not surprising, that publishers scored so low on marketing and feedback. It would be interesting to see how the marketing stuff varies between the big-6 and the smaller publishers. (Also: 321 is not a huge dataset, it could be interesting to see a larger scale survey.)

AlexBell: this makes a nice contrast to the recent discussion about Konrath's unilateral view of commercial publishing, thanks for posting.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote