View Single Post
Old 05-24-2012, 07:31 PM   #1
iJn
Member
iJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animalsiJn is kind to children and small, furry animals
 
Posts: 23
Karma: 6610
Join Date: Sep 2011
Device: Kindle Touch
Apple says DoJ "sides with monopoly, rather than competition"

Full Article

Quote:
Apple has accused the US government of siding "with monopoly, rather than competition" by suing Apple and six publishers for allegedly colluding to fix e-book prices. Apple's response to the Department of Justice's lawsuit offers strong words for the DoJ and those who believe Apple has engaged in a conspiracy with publishers in order to give itself an advantage in the market.

Right off the bat, Apple's response calls the DoJ's complaint "fundamentally flawed as a matter of fact and law." The electronics giant says it negotiated individual agreements with each publisher so Apple could enter the e-book market, arguing that before the launch of the iBookstore in 2010, the only real player in the e-book space was Amazon and its Kindle Store.

"At the time Apple entered the market, Amazon sold nearly nine out of every ten eBooks, and its power over price and product selection was nearly absolute," Apple wrote. "Apple’s entry spurred tremendous growth in eBook titles, range and variety of offerings, sales, and improved quality of the eBook reading experience."

Throughout its 31-page response, Apple pulls no punches in expressing its opinion about the accusations. The electronic giant says the government started with a "false premise" and calls the DoJ action "absurd." Apple also says the government fails to show how the "agency model," which is what the iBookstore uses and Amazon now uses, harms consumers. The strategy has been "long recognized as perfectly lawful," Apple argues, and if not for the agency model, Apple would not have entered the e-book market in the first place.
iJn is offline   Reply With Quote