View Single Post
Old 05-23-2012, 12:42 PM   #122
geekmaster
Carpe diem, c'est la vie.
geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
geekmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,433
Karma: 10773670
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Multiverse 6627A
Device: K1 to PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by knc1 View Post
You are speed reading again, post #118 calls tcc through your wrapper script, my request does not - it makes a difference.
PS: I did not get a PM before you posted that I had done something wrong.
The output from a tcc command is exactly the same when you type it by hand OR when a wrapper script generates that exact same command. If the command was typed outside the wrapper script, it would fail because of the missing bind mounts. The same command done by the tccmake script worked (with output in post #118) because it was called from the wrapper script. Do not discard my output that I posted in reply to your request just because of some trivial detail of HOW it was created.

The RESULTS posted in #118 ARE what you asked for. It does not matter that they were created with a wrapper script. So either run the script, or do the bind mounts yourself before typing the command. The script is easier. That is why I wrote it.

Your post did not take the CONTENTS of my previous post into account (even after you quoted my link to it), so I agree that ONE of us must be "speed reading", as you say. I did not accuse you of doing anything wrong, despite your P.S. claiming that I did. If you READ what I wrote, you will see that I am trying to synchronize our parallel "threads of thought", where your posts request information that I already provided.

Last edited by geekmaster; 05-23-2012 at 03:54 PM.
geekmaster is offline   Reply With Quote