View Single Post
Old 05-17-2012, 02:29 PM   #54
afv011
Captain Penguin
afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
afv011's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,966
Karma: 2079999999
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Device: Kobo Clara BW, Kobo Libra 2, Nook Glowlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydog View Post
I had hoped that current technology would prevent this to a degree. When the NGL first appeared in B&N stores I compared the NGL, NST and KT side by side. It was quite apparent that the NGL screen displayed less contrast/sharpness than the Simple Touch or Kindle Touch. If there is any degradation of the Perl display on the upcoming lighted Kindle I will be very disappointed.
This layer is needed to distribute the light uniformly across the screen. I have seen a nook glow, and I would say the decrease in contrast is not that significant, and you can tell only by putting it next to a non-glow nook. It is way better than the Sony's that had the touch screen pre-infrared.

The alternative would be to have multiple light sources on the bezel and get rid of the "screen protector" that distributes the light, but you wouldn't get even lightning and would consume more battery power, as you'd have more LEDs. I think the current approach is the right one, a small price to pay for even lightning across the screen.
afv011 is offline   Reply With Quote