View Single Post
Old 05-17-2012, 03:20 AM   #8
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belfaborac View Post
6000 cycles is bloody excellent, but what would be truly great is a combination of the breakthroughs in the first link and the one just above. As nice as a huge improvements in cycles is, a doubling, tripling or quadrupling of how long a charge lasts would be far better, even with no improvements in cycles.
Number of charge cycles, though, is not the only consideration with a battery. With a lithium battery, for example, the battery "ages" with time; the internal resistance gradually increases, reducing its charge capacity, regardless of how often it's charged. With a device like an ereader, this ageing effect totally swamps the effect of the number of charge cycles. With something like a laptop, it's the other way around; there, the number of charge cycles is what dominates.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote