Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres
Taking both filings at face value, the judge effectively said Apple was a part of the conspiracy and thus must answer in court for its deeds.
That simple.
The phrasing hints that Apple might actually be the instigator, and was taking advantage of the gullibility of the publishers so, who knows; maybe they'll all roll on Apple. 
 |
She didn't use the terms allegedly, suspected of, or charged with collusion.
In the end, it may not be her decision if it goes to jury.