View Single Post
Old 05-16-2012, 09:46 AM   #220
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,390
Karma: 68329346
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
I don't know about the 5 year claim (I mean, I guess you could only use the router once in 5 years....) or any broad assurance of scope, but it is certainly true that routing tables are not the same as logs, and a forensic analysis of even a cheap consumer router will reveal data that the router MUST have internally in order to function, regardless of logging, including info about NAT/PAT mappings and which internal private IP got or sent which request from which external IP.

It's even possible (though I don't recall the protocol specifics---"loose-source routing" perhaps?) that your private IP is included along with the packet data and may be logged by other systems on the Internet.

Last edited by ApK; 05-16-2012 at 09:50 AM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote