Quote:
Originally Posted by crich70
I'm just saying that he could have been saying, "if you do this then this will happen" but we can't know either way since he isn't here to answer for what his meaning was. And it is in bad taste (IMO) for them to attack a dead man who can't speak in his own defense. I mean if you were to die and someone then accused you of something do you think that would be fair? If someone is to be accused of something let it be when they are able to answer their accusers back.
|
I realise he isn't here to defend himself, but then this isn't a personal charge. It's Apple that's being charged with masterminding the collusion, and they're answerable for the actions of the person they appointed to act on their behalf. It's not like Jobs is being held personally responsible. As far as the court is concerned, Jobs and Apple are the same party, and Apple exists to answer to any charges. I agree with what you say when it comes to individual liability.