View Single Post
Old 05-15-2012, 03:59 AM   #48
caleb72
Indie Advocate
caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.caleb72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
caleb72's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,863
Karma: 18794463
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Device: Kindle
There is a certain amount of fungibility in book purchasing. A Twilight book bought at Amazon is pretty much interchangeable with one bought in Barnes & Noble. If Little Brown ceded publishing rights to Haper & Collins, there would be a certain fungibility between the Little Brown release and the H&C release.

I agree that not any book will do for a large majority - but any Twilight book may do.

Having said that, no Twilight book will do for me. But for the sake of using the existing examples...

So I guess it depends on whether you think each book/title/work should be considered a commodity in its own right - ie reasonably fungible, or whether we can only play this game looking at all books collectively.

I would think the collusion at hand increases this notion of fungibility because you remove price differences for individual titles as well as the inherent content interchangeability.
caleb72 is offline   Reply With Quote