View Single Post
Old 05-14-2012, 12:11 PM   #31
ilovejedd
hopeless n00b
ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ilovejedd's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,110
Karma: 19597086
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: in the middle of nowhere
Device: PW4, PW3, Libra H2O, iPad 10.5, iPad 11, iPad 12.9
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
I'd be very surprised if any 7" iPad was below $299, given that the iPod Touch starts at $199. $249 would be an extremely attractive price. They don't need to price-match the Fire to draw market away from it.
I reckon $249 is quite feasible given Apple's economies of scale. They can use the same Apple A5 CPU used in the iPhone 4S or iPad 2. Besides, more likely than not, storage on the $249 would be so small (perhaps 8GB similar to the iPod Touch?) that most people would pony up for the next higher model (likely 32GB at $100 more).
ilovejedd is offline   Reply With Quote