But it's labeling books "Most Read" just based upon publishing and sales, which is a misnomer. "Most Sold" might be the correct title for the list (though that also is debatable). Just because a book is sold does not mean it has been read.
My point was that there are books within that 50 year time span that probably better fall into a "Most Read" listing, which in and of itself should have nothing to do with book sales. If they are calling those books in their list the "Most Read", then it should be based upon verification that all those books sold were actually read.
