View Single Post
Old 05-13-2012, 07:23 AM   #26
Ninjalawyer
Guru
Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Ninjalawyer's Avatar
 
Posts: 826
Karma: 18573626
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Touch, Nexus 7 (2013)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
So? They can write their own letters. As it is, is pretty clear that the DOJ has taken the viewpoint that lower prices for the consumers in the short term trump all, so the 'consumer advocates ' likely see no reason to write.
I suspect the DOJ position is more that collusion among competitors is illegal, and are less concerned about the price. But hey, if it makes it easier for you to support the publishing industry's illegal activity by saying, "The DOJ is just concerned with saving customers a few bucks in the short term!", then more power to you I guess; we all have to reduce our cognitive dissonance somehow.
Ninjalawyer is offline   Reply With Quote