Thread: Write-in campaign claims that no readers were harmed by the agency model
View Single Post
Old 05-12-2012, 12:22 PM   #12
Catlady
Grand Sorcerer
Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Catlady's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,419
Karma: 52613881
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
Quote:
Originally Posted by rleguillow View Post
Fungible, huh? I had to look that up. And I beg to disagree. I personally would be very unhappy if you replaced my Lord of the Rings trilogy with any number of Harlequin romances. No insult intended to the romances, it just doesn't seem to me that they are interchangeable.

I shudder at the notion that books are fungible, but it seems to me that a lot of people on MR DO think books are at least borderline fungible. How many MRers say they don't need to read the best-sellers and the Agency books because they can find adequate substitutes for free or rock-bottom prices?
Catlady is offline   Reply With Quote