View Single Post
Old 05-09-2012, 12:07 PM   #17
plib
Guru
plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.plib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 777
Karma: 6356004
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kobo Touch
First you quote Tschmuck, and then Liebowitz. Tschmuck actually doesn't think very much of the "unrealistic assumptions" in Liebowitz's study (quite apart from the fact that Liebowitz was a fellow of the Heartland Institute - hardly a recommendation). Maybe you should also link to a more detailed summary of what Tschmuck has to say, in particular his conclusion:

Quote:
As a conclusion, Tschmuck offers the following (translation L.D.):

Anyone who wants to belong to future winners has to abandon traditional business models and harvest new opportunities for making profit. The battle against music file-sharing networks is thereby definitly not a sensible way to pursue. One should rather consider how these new forms of using music can be economically capitalized, which brings us to the discussions on music flat-rates and new types of copyright.
Actually, maybe you should just find a better source than "Copyhype" for your links.

Last edited by plib; 05-09-2012 at 12:09 PM.
plib is offline   Reply With Quote