View Single Post
Old 05-06-2012, 04:38 AM   #214
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightGeometry View Post
Would TPB be able to bring a charge of libel against the people who bought the case? Or, the indies who use TPB to promote themselves (libel by association?). I know speech in court is protected, but is bringing an action itself capable of being libel?

The obvious thing being - libel is hugely expensive to defend. If everyone promoting bought an action individually it may have an effect. (Hopefully it would just get our libel and defamation laws fixed)
Libel on what grounds? What part of the court's judgement do you believe is untrue? If a statement is true, it cannot be libellous.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote