Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
The "significant non-infringing use" test has been the primary criterion applies to copyright infringement cases for many, many years, in both the US and UK.
|
How was the court made aware of the non-infringing use of the site? I can't really see the BPI telling them about all the independent musicians promoting themselves on there, and nobody from the site itself was invited. So who put forward the other side of the argument so that the judge could make a balanced and reasoned judgement?