View Single Post
Old 05-04-2012, 12:37 PM   #65
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrosvit View Post
I really believe that it is preferable that 10 guilty people go free rather than one innocent person be convicted. And I think that possibility is too great if we just use an IP address to determine guilt.
Let me ask you a question, if I may. Consider this scenario:

I live alone. I'm an IT professional, and have been for 30-odd years. I have a properly secured wireless network (WPA2, lengthy string of completely random characters for a passphrase). Nobody but me ever uses my computers. Doesn't take a genius to figure out that if copyrighted material is downloaded via my IP connection then I'm the one who did the deed.

Now, let's suppose I'm a pirate. I think to myself, "aha! If I remove the encryption from my WiFi, I've got a 'get out of jail free' card. If anyone tries to prosecute me for copyright infringement, all I have to do is say that someone else must have used by WiFi without my knowledge!"

True or not?

If true, it's a sad state of affair, to my mind .
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote