View Single Post
Old 05-04-2012, 12:06 PM   #49
hrosvit
Moron
hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hrosvit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
hrosvit's Avatar
 
Posts: 333
Karma: 3113890
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Southwest PA
Device: iPad 3, Galaxy Note 2, Nook ST
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninjalawyer View Post
I don't usually agree with HarryT, but I wouldn't be opposed to having an account holder responsible if the penalties were restricted to reasonable fines rather than massive fines and criminal sanctions, and provided the person accused had some meaningful way to dispute the claim. Seems like a fairly reasonable compromise.
In theory, I am okay with a person being responsible for their own IP address. But in practice, I'm not sure it works. Additionally, do you not think this would have a chilling effect on the public availability of wifi? Obviously, some people may not think that this would be a bad thing, but I'm not sure I agree.
hrosvit is offline   Reply With Quote